Current:Home > reviewsSocial media influencers tell you to buy, buy, buy. Stop listening to them. -FundTrack
Social media influencers tell you to buy, buy, buy. Stop listening to them.
View
Date:2025-04-14 13:50:25
Americans' credit card debt soared to a startling $1.13 trillion at the end of last year. The majority of that debt can be attributed to rising interest rates and the higher cost-of-living overall, but an estimated 7% of Americans are compulsive shoppers, accumulating significant credit card debt through hundreds of nonessential purchases.
The enticements to buy are never-ending. Spend five minutes scrolling through influencer content on social media and you’ll encounter an array of expensive products flung in your face in the form of subscriptions, skincare aids, exercise equipment and just about anything else you can imagine.
From everyday advertisements to shopping haul videos to the popular “what I spend in a day” motif, influencers are pushing purchase after purchase at their viewers. It’s no surprise that purchases of personal care items and clothing are on the rise, with the majority of that spending considered nonessential. Americans are overspending, falling victim to overconsumption and perpetuating a cycle of wastefulness.
Social media shamelessly promotes materialism. Advertising is everywhere on social platforms − not just when influencers shower praise on the brands that sponsor them, but also in each strategically placed item facing the camera, brand name out.
Lifestyle influencers’ platforms often focus on strategies for happiness and well-being, showcasing an idyllic life that involves little beyond a daily workout in expensive clothing and aesthetically pleasing meals. The message is that money can buy you love − and happiness. You just need to spend it all to have it all.
College degrees still matter:Young conservatives like me are told not to attend college. That's shortsighted.
Influencers create a false sense of reality
Sure, we know that these lifestyles aren’t realistic, but it’s all too easy to believe that influencers' routines are candid, accurate representations of the creators' daily lives.
What many consumers – myself included – often fail to recognize is that social media is a business. A survey conducted by Later found that 94% of influencers make money via brand partnerships – when a brand pays the influencer to market their product to their viewers.
Many influencers make a large part of their profits through Amazon Storefronts, where they link products that they display and encourage viewers to shop from there. It’s anyone’s guess whether the content creators actually like or even use the products.
Influencers capitalize off of their viewers’ compulsive buying habits, equating their seemingly perfect lives with the amount of goods they own. Lifestyle influencers love to display their thousands of beauty products, dozens of Amazon packages on their doorsteps and color-coded fully stocked fridges as the secrets for a romantic life. Their content is based on the idea that their happiness, or at least the illusion of happiness, is found through stuff. Want to be as organized and put-together as me? Shop these products through the link in my bio!
Never mind that most of the lifestyles portrayed online are unattainable (and often staged). We still grow jealous of the wealth and fame that influencers flaunt.
Content creators keep pushing us to buy more, more, more, and a recent study found that social media use has a correlation with materialism, promoting the desire for more and more possessions. Yet, contrary to popular belief, owning more “stuff” has been demonstrated to be detrimental to overall life satisfaction.
No Instagram, no TikTok:I wasn't allowed a smartphone until I was 16. I can't thank my parents enough.
This overconsumption of products marketed on social media is not only dangerous for your wallet; it’s also bad for the environment.
The lifestyle that internet personalities advertise is incredibly wasteful. Any fridge or pantry restock video features dozens of single-use plastic items arranged pleasingly in organized acrylic bins ‒ individually wrapped snacks, plastic bottles of water, soft drinks in aluminum cans. This amount of waste is unjustifiable, especially because it’s more about aesthetics than practicality.
Influencers push fast fashion that hurts the environment
Even worse, social media has contributed to the rise of fast fashion: cheap, mass-produced clothing that caters to trendiness rather than quality. This results in mind-blowing amounts of textile waste and water pollution from dyes, as world consumption of clothing has increased by 400% in the past 20 years.
Then there are the accusations of labor law violations and personal information theft from major fast-fashion retailers such as Shein and Temu.
The primary goal of influencers is to make money, not help their viewers make smart purchases.
Most of us don’t get paid to have a 17-step skincare routine. Influencers do. Their job is glorified advertising. And guess what? You don’t need most, if not all, of the products that they claim you do.
We need to think about where and why we spend our money. If it’s to mimic a 45-second video of people who film themselves getting out of bed in the morning, maybe put away your wallet.
You’ll probably be happier and the earth will, too.
Christine Schueckler is a USA TODAY Opinion intern and a rising third year student at the University of Virginia, where she studies English and French. At UVA, she writes for The Jefferson Independent and performs with the UVA University Singers.
veryGood! (217)
Related
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- 20 Best Amazon Dresses Under $40 That Shoppers Are Raving About
- Atlanta man pleads guilty to making phone threats to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
- Hit with falling sales, McDonald's extends popular $5 meal deal, eyes big new burger
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Wildfire doubles in Colorado’s Rocky Mountains as evacuations continue
- Report: U.S. Olympic swimmers David Johnston, Luke Whitlock test positive for COVID-19
- Delaney Schnell, Jess Parratto fail to add medals while Chinese diving stars shine
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Ex-clients of Social Security fraudster Eric Conn won’t owe back payments to government
Ranking
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- With the funeral behind them, family of the firefighter killed at the Trump rally begins grieving
- 2024 Olympics: Judo Star Dislocates Shoulder While Celebrating Bronze Medal
- Serbia spoils Olympic debut for Jimmer Fredette, men's 3x3 basketball team
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Delta CEO says airline is facing $500 million in costs from global tech outage
- Amy Wilson-Hardy, rugby sevens player, faces investigation for alleged racist remarks
- Lawsuit against North Carolina officer who shot and killed teen can continue, court says
Recommendation
California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
Natalie Portman, Serena Williams and More Flip Out in the Crowd at Women's Gymnastics Final
Missouri woman admits kidnapping and killing a pregnant Arkansas woman
When does Katie Ledecky swim next? What time does she compete in 1,500 freestyle final?
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
Boeing names new CEO as it posts a loss of more than $1.4 billion in second quarter
Olympics 2024: A Deep Dive Into Why Lifeguards Are Needed at Swimming Pools
Channing Tatum Reveals How Ryan Reynolds Fought for Him in Marvelous Tribute