Current:Home > MyRepublicans challenge North Carolina decision that lets students show university’s mobile ID -FundTrack
Republicans challenge North Carolina decision that lets students show university’s mobile ID
View
Date:2025-04-14 09:18:29
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The Republican Party sued North Carolina’s elections board on Thursday to block students and employees at the state’s flagship public university from offering a digital identification as a way to comply with a relatively new photo voter ID law.
The Republican National Committee and North Carolina filed the lawsuit in Wake County Superior Court three weeks after the Democratic majority on the State Board of Elections approved the “Mobile UNC One Card” generated by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill as a qualifying ID.
The law says qualifying IDs must meet several photo and security requirements to be approved by the board. The UNC-Chapel Hill digital ID, which is voluntary for students and staff and available on Apple phones, marks the qualification of the first such ID posted from someone’s smartphone.
The Republican groups said state law clearly requires any of several categories of permitted identifications — from driver’s licenses to U.S. passports and university and military IDs — to be only in a physical form.
The law doesn’t allow the state board “to expand the circumstances of what is an acceptable student identification card, beyond a tangible, physical item, to something only found on a computer system,” the lawsuit reads.
The state and national GOP contend in the lawsuit that the board’s unilateral expansion of photo ID before registering and accepting voters at in-person poll sites “could allow hundreds or thousands of ineligible voters” to vote in the November election and beyond. North Carolina is a presidential battleground state where statewide races are usually very close.
An electronically stored photo ID may be easier to alter than a physical card and more difficult for a precinct worker to review, including when there are computer network problems, the lawsuit says. The groups also filed a separate request for a judge to issue a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction preventing the use of the mobile ID.
In response to an email seeking a response to the lawsuit, a state board spokesperson pointed late Thursday to the board’s discussion at its Aug 20 meeting.
A board attorney said during the meeting there was nothing in the law that specifically limits approval to printed cards. Board Chair Alan Hirsch, a Democrat, cited trends in technology in giving the ID his OK, saying that airline passengers now show boarding passes from their smartphones.
The current voter ID law was initially approved in late 2018. But it didn’t get carried out until the 2023 municipal elections as legal challenges continued.
The board has OK’d over 130 traditional student and employee IDs as qualifying for voting purposes in 2024, including UNC-Chapel Hill’s physical One Card. Someone who can’t show a qualifying ID casts a provisional ballot and either fills out an exception form or provides an ID before ballot counts are complete. In-person early voting begins Oct. 17.
People casting traditional absentee ballots also are asked to put a copy of an ID into their envelope. A board official said that UNC-Chapel Hill voters with the One Card can now insert a photocopy of the One Card displayed on their phones to meet the requirement.
The first absentee ballots were supposed to be distributed to voters who had requested one starting Sept. 6. But appeals court rulings declaring that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s name must be removed are forcing county elections official to reprint ballots. No new date for the start of the distribution of absentee ballots has been announced.
veryGood! (837)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Q&A: A Harvard Expert on Environment and Health Discusses Possible Ties Between COVID and Climate
- Honolulu Sues Petroleum Companies For Climate Change Damages to City
- American Climate Video: Al Cathey Had Seen Hurricanes, but Nothing Like Michael
- 'Most Whopper
- Best Memorial Day 2023 Home Deals: Dyson, Vitamix, Le Creuset, Sealy, iRobot, Pottery Barn, and More
- Trump and Biden Diverged Widely and Wildly During the Debate’s Donnybrook on Climate Change
- Having an out-of-body experience? Blame this sausage-shaped piece of your brain
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- U.S., European heat waves 'virtually impossible' without climate change, new study finds
Ranking
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Pregnant Ohio mom fatally shot by 2-year-old son who found gun on nightstand, police say
- A look at Titanic wreck ocean depth and water pressure — and how they compare to the deep sea as a whole
- Sarah, the Duchess of York, undergoes surgery following breast cancer diagnosis
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Overdose deaths involving street xylazine surged years earlier than reported
- Hawaii Eyes Offshore Wind to Reach its 100 Percent Clean Energy Goal
- Taylor Swift's Reaction to Keke Palmer's Karma Shout-Out Is a Vibe Like That
Recommendation
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
One year after the Dobbs ruling, abortion has changed the political landscape
Abortion access could continue to change in year 2 after the overturn of Roe v. Wade
A Judge’s Ruling Ousted Federal Lands Chief. Now Some Want His Decisions Tossed, Too
New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
U.S. pedestrian deaths reach a 40-year high
What heat dome? They're still skiing in Colorado
Oil Pipelines or Climate Action? Trudeau Walks a Political Tightrope in Canada