Current:Home > News10 Senators Call for Investigation into EPA Pushing Scientists Off Advisory Boards -FundTrack
10 Senators Call for Investigation into EPA Pushing Scientists Off Advisory Boards
View
Date:2025-04-15 02:07:31
A group of Senate Democrats is calling for an expanded investigation into efforts by the Trump Environmental Protection Agency to effectively push independent scientists off key EPA advisory boards and replace them with scientists from the fossil fuel and chemical industries.
In a letter sent to the Government Accountability Office on Thursday, the 10 senators asked the GAO to investigate a new directive, issued by EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on Oct. 31, that restricts any scientist who has received EPA funding from serving on the agency’s scientific advisory panels.
Pruitt said the move was intended to clear up conflicts of interest and to rid advisory panel members of financial ties to the agency. But scientific groups, academics and advocacy organizations have all pointed out that it will mean the most experienced scientists—whose qualifications earn them government grants in the first place—will no longer be able to serve in these roles.
“The double-standard is striking: an academic scientist that receives an EPA grant for any purpose cannot provide independent advice on a completely different subject matter on any of EPA’s science advisory boards,” the senators wrote, “while industry scientists are presumed to have no inherent conflict even if their research is entirely funded by a company with a financial stake in an advisory board’s conclusions.”
Five days after Pruitt issued the directive, The Washington Post reported that he appointed 66 new members to advisory panels, many of them with ties to industries the agency regulates. Several panel members stepped down.
“Under this new policy, EPA will be replacing representatives of public and private universities including Harvard, Stanford, Ohio State University, and the University of Southern California with scientists who work for Phillips 66, Total, Southern Company, and the American Chemistry Council,” the senators wrote.
In response to a request for comment, an EPA spokesperson replied: “The Administrator has issued a directive which clearly states his policy with regard to grantees.” The agency did not respond to questions about whether new members will be required to sign conflict of interest declarations or undergo a review process.
Earlier this year, the EPA said it would not renew the terms of members of its broader Board of Scientific Counselors, and beyond EPA, the administration has allowed other scientific boards to expire altogether. In August, the acting head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) told members of an advisory panel for the National Climate Assessment that it would allow the panel’s charter to lapse.
The recent Pruitt directive is similar to legislation long pushed by Republicans in Congress, including a bill introduced earlier this year called the EPA Science Advisory Board Reform Act.
Science organizations have pointed out that anyone receiving a federal grant undergoes a merit review, which scrutinizes their professional standards and ethics, and that grant applicants have to declare they have no conflicts of interest before receiving government grants.
“EPA’s decisions have real implications for the health and well-being of Americans and in some cases people worldwide,” wrote Chris McEntee, the executive director of the American Geophysical Union. “By curtailing the input of some of the most respected minds in science, Pruitt’s decision robs the agency, and by extension Americans, of a critically important resource.”
The senators’ letter on Thursday follows a previous request to the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, to investigate the EPA’s policies and procedures related to advisory panels.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- The Daily Money: Saying no to parenthood
- Richard Simmons' housekeeper Teresa Reveles opens up about fitness personality's death
- The Latest: Harris ad calls her ‘fearless,’ while Trump ad blasts her for border problems
- Trump's 'stop
- Second spectator injured in Trump campaign rally shooting released from hospital
- BMW, Chrysler, Ford, Maserati among 313K vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here
- Tom Daley’s Son Phoenix Makes a Splash While Interrupting Diver After Olympic Medal Win
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Massachusetts governor says there’s nothing she can do to prevent 2 hospitals from closing
Ranking
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Olympic medals today: What is the medal count at 2024 Paris Games on Tuesday?
- Lawsuit says Norfolk Southern’s freight trains cause chronic delays for Amtrak
- Utility cuts natural gas service to landslide-stricken Southern California neighborhood
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- ‘TikTok, do your thing’: Why are young people scared to make first move?
- 2024 Olympics: Colin Jost Shares Photo of Injured Foot After Surfing Event in Tahiti
- Woman killed and 2 others wounded in shooting near New York City migrant shelter
Recommendation
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
Boar's Head faces first suit in fatal listeria outbreak after 88-year-old fell 'deathly ill'
Secret Service and FBI officials are set to testify about Trump assassination attempt in latest hearing
Olympics 2024: Brazilian Gymnast Flavia Saraiva Competes With Black Eye After Scary Fall
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
Did the Olympics mock the Last Supper? Explaining Dionysus and why Christians are angry
Chants of 'Heil Hitler' shouted by antisemitic protestors at Israel Olympic soccer game
When's the next Federal Reserve meeting? Here's when to expect updates on current rate.