Current:Home > MyVoters in Arizona and Montana can decide on constitutional right to abortion -FundTrack
Voters in Arizona and Montana can decide on constitutional right to abortion
NovaQuant View
Date:2025-04-11 09:26:27
PHOENIX (AP) — Voters in Arizona and Montana will be able to decide in November whether they want to protect the right to an abortion in their state constitutions.
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a 200-word summary that abortion advocates used to collect signatures for a ballot measure is valid, clearing the way for the issue to remain on the ballot.
Montana Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen on Tuesday certified Montana’s constitutional initiative for the November ballot.
Under both measures, abortions would be allowed until fetal viability — the point at which a fetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks.
In Arizona, there are some exceptions for post-viability abortions to save the mother’s life or to protect her physical or mental health. Montana’s measure allows later abortions if needed to protect the mother’s life or health.
Montana’s initiative would enshrine in the constitution a 1999 state Supreme Court ruling that found the constitutional right to privacy includes the right of a patient to receive an abortion from a provider of their choice. Supporters sought to protect the right as Republican lawmakers passed bills to restrict abortion rights.
Voters in more than a half-dozen states will be deciding abortion measures this fall. The U.S. Supreme Court removed the nationwide right to abortion with a 2022 ruling, which sparked a national push to have voters decide.
“Since Roe was overturned, extreme anti-abortion politicians have used every trick in the book to take away our freedoms and ban abortion completely,” Martha Fuller, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Montana, said in a statement. “During that time, we have been working together to put this issue before voters.”
Recent decisions from the Arizona Supreme Court come ahead of a Thursday ballot printing deadline. Montana’s ballot must be certified by Thursday.
Arizona’s justices sided with Republican lawmakers in a separate case concerning the abortion ballot measure last week to allow a voter information pamphlet to refer to an embryo or fetus as an “unborn human being.” That language will not appear on the ballots.
In another case, the justices ruled a legislative proposal to let local police make arrests near the state’s border with Mexico will appear on the ballot for voters to decide. The court had rejected a challenge from Latino groups that argued the ballot measure violated a rule in the state constitution that says legislative proposals must cover a single subject.
In the latest abortion measure case, Arizona Right to Life sued over the petition summary, arguing it was misleading.
The high court justices rejected that argument, as well as the claim that the petition summary for the proposed amendment failed to mention it would overturn existing abortion laws if approved by voters. The court in its ruling states that “(r)easonable people” can differ over the best way to describe a key provision of a ballot measure, but a court should not entangle itself in those disputes.
“Regardless of the ruling, we are looking forward to working with our pro-life partners across the state to continue to inform voters about this ambiguous language,” said Susan Haugland, spokesperson for Arizona Right to Life.
Arizona for Abortion Access, which launched the initiative, said the ruling is a “huge win” and advocates will be working around the clock to encourage voters to support it.
“We are confident that this fall, Arizona voters will make history by establishing a fundamental right to abortion in our state, once and for all,” the group said in a statement.
The Arizona secretary of state’s office recently certified 577,971 signatures — far above the number required to put the question before voters.
Democrats have made abortion rights a central message since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 — and it is a key part of their efforts in this year’s elections.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Rapper Enchanting's Cause of Death Revealed
- New Orleans is finally paying millions of dollars in decades-old legal judgments
- Row house fire in Philadelphia kills woman, girl; man, boy taken to hospitals with 3rd-degree burns
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Alabama park system acquires beach property in Fort Morgam
- Police search for the attacker who killed 3 in a knifing in the German city of Solingen
- Amazon announces upcoming discount event, Prime Big Deal Days in October: What to know
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- South Carolina sets date for first execution in more than 13 years
Ranking
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- US Border Patrol agent told women to show him their breasts to get into country: Feds
- Indianapolis police fatally shoot man inside motel room during struggle while serving warrant
- A rare orchid survives on a few tracts of prairie. Researchers want to learn its secrets
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Sales tax revenue, full costs unclear if North Dakota voters legalize recreational marijuana
- Hailey Bieber and Justin Bieber Reveal Name of First Baby
- Sales tax revenue, full costs unclear if North Dakota voters legalize recreational marijuana
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
No. 10 Florida State started season with playoff hopes but got exposed by Georgia Tech
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Reunite in Rhode Island During Eras Tour Break
A rare orchid survives on a few tracts of prairie. Researchers want to learn its secrets
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
New Orleans is finally paying millions of dollars in decades-old legal judgments
Vermont medical marijuana user fired after drug test loses appeal over unemployment benefits
Here's What Judge Mathis' Estranged Wife Linda Is Seeking in Their Divorce