Current:Home > reviewsHackers steal sensitive law enforcement data in a breach of the U.S. Marshals Service -FundTrack
Hackers steal sensitive law enforcement data in a breach of the U.S. Marshals Service
View
Date:2025-04-17 17:25:26
The oldest U.S. federal law enforcement agency, the U.S. Marshals Service, has revealed it was the victim of a cyberattack last week in which hackers stole sensitive data.
According to a U.S. Marshals spokesperson, the "major incident" impacted a "standalone" computer system which contained records about targets of ongoing investigations, employee personal data and internal processes.
Importantly, according to the spokesperson, the system did not include personal details about people enrolled in the Federal Witness Protection Program, whose lives could be in danger if publicly exposed. The U.S. Marshals claim the system is not connected to the broader network, and was quickly shut down when the breach was discovered before turning the investigation over to the Department of Justice.
The Service said it learned about the attack on Feb. 17, when it discovered what it described as a ransomware attack in which the hackers were actively exfiltrating sensitive files. The breach was first reported by NBC News.
"The Department's remediation efforts and criminal forensic investigations are ongoing," a U.S. Marshals Service spokesperson wrote in an email. "We are working swiftly and effectively to mitigate any potential risks as a result of the incident."
The U.S. Marshals Service did not provide additional information about whether the attackers threatened to release stolen data if a ransom was not paid, or details on how the agency is accessing its records in a workaround following the breach.
If the attackers broke in and encrypted the files in what looked like a ransomware attack, but never demanded payment, it's possible there was never any financial motivation for stealing the information.
Government agencies are attractive targets for foreign espionage, and the FBI, another federal law enforcement agency, specifically recommends that ransoms not be paid. It is unlikely a savvy criminal ransomware gang would expect payment from the U.S. Marshals. However, some criminal groups seek out targets indiscriminately based on security vulnerabilities or opportunity.
If no ransom was demanded, that could speak to the potential hidden motivation. Nation-state adversaries including Iran and Russia have launched destructive attacks designed to look like ransomware in an effort to cover up efforts to steal intelligence or cause disruption in the past. Just recently, companies like Microsoft have tracked who they say are Russian military hackers launching what looked like ransomware attacks in Poland and Ukraine in an effort to gather intelligence and cause chaos.
The Justice Department is investigating the source of the breach, while the U.S. Marshals work on restoring service. They are currently using a workaround to access sensitive files including information about investigative targets, so as not to delay ongoing casework. However, it's unclear whether the Marshals were able to recover the files, or are accessing copies from a backup server or other computer system.
Finally, it's unclear whether the attackers are still considering whether to release the files that were stolen.
veryGood! (67)
Related
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- How a top economic adviser to Biden is thinking about inflation and the job market
- With Putin’s reelection all but assured, Russia’s opposition still vows to undermine his image
- More than 70 million people face increased threats from sea level rise worldwide
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- AP Week in Pictures: North America
- André 3000's new instrumental album marks departure from OutKast rap roots: Life changes, life moves on
- Mexican immigration agents detain 2 Iranians who they say were under observation by the FBI
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- UN takes no immediate action at emergency meeting on Guyana-Venezuela dispute over oil-rich region
Ranking
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Arkansas man sentenced to 5 1/2 years for firebombing police cars during 2020 protests
- The Excerpt podcast: VP Harris warns Israel it must follow international law in Gaza.
- US Sen. Kevin Cramer’s son makes court appearance after crash that killed North Dakota deputy
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Missouri lawmakers propose allowing homicide charges for women who have abortions
- Deemed Sustainable by Seafood Industry Monitors, Harvested California Squid Has an Unmeasurable Energy Footprint
- A ‘soft landing’ or a recession? How each one might affect America’s households and businesses
Recommendation
What to watch: O Jolie night
Robin Myers named interim president for Arkansas State University System
Pope Francis makes his first public appearances since being stricken by bronchitis
Drinks are on him: Michigan man wins $160,000 playing lottery game at local bar
What to watch: O Jolie night
Trump gag order in 2020 election case largely upheld by appeals court
Why do doctors still use pagers?
Local New Hampshire newspaper publisher found guilty of political advertisement omissions